In a Louisiana congressional redistricting case, the panel said the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans rejected arguments that there is no private right to sue under the Voting Rights Act. 10, three judges on the conservative-dominated 5th U.S. The Gorsuch and Thomas opinion was referenced less than two weeks ago in another federal court decision that came to the opposite conclusion of Monday’s ruling by the St. But Gorsuch and Thomas were among the dissenters in June when the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in another Voting Rights Act case in favor of Black voters in Alabama who objected to the state’s congressional districts. Gorsuch wrote that there was no need in that case for the justices to consider who may sue. “Our cases have assumed - without deciding - that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 furnishes an implied cause of action under section 2.” “I join the court’s opinion in full, but flag one thing it does not decide,” Gorsuch wrote at the time, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. Supreme Court, where the issue was raised in a 2021 opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch. It’s likely the case eventually will make it to the U.S. Meanwhile, several pending lawsuits by private groups challenge various political maps drawn by legislators across the country. Monday’s ruling applies only to federal courts covered by the 8th Circuit, which includes Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. The Justice Department filed a “statement of interest” in the case saying private parties can file lawsuits to enforce the Voting Rights Act but declined to comment on the ruling. District Judge Lee Rudofsky noted there was “a strong merits case that at least some of the challenged districts” in the lawsuit violate the federal Voting Rights Act but said he could not rule after concluding a challenge could only be brought by the U.S. They said the state could have drawn 16 majority-Black districts to more closely mirror the state’s demographics. The state’s redistricting plan created 11 majority-Black districts, which the groups argued was too few. The state NAACP chapter and the public policy group had challenged new Arkansas state House districts as diluting the influence of Black voters. A statement from the ACLU said they are exploring their options.īarry Jefferson, political action chair of the Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP, called the ruling “a devastating blow to the civil rights of every American, and the integrity of our nation’s electoral system.” It was not immediately clear whether the groups would appeal. “By failing to reverse the district court’s radical decision, the Eighth Circuit has put the Voting Rights Act in jeopardy, tossing aside critical protections that voters fought and died for,” Lakin said in a statement.

Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, called the ruling a “travesty for democracy.” She had argued the appeal on behalf of the two Arkansas groups. “Rights so foundational to self-government and citizenship should not depend solely on the discretion or availability of the government’s agents for protection,” wrote Smith, another appointee of George W. Smith said the court should follow “existing precedent that permits a judicial remedy” unless the Supreme Court or Congress decides differently. Supreme Court have considered numerous cases brought by private plaintiffs under Section 2. Smith noted in a dissenting opinion that federal courts across the country and the U.S. Garland five days to join the lawsuit.Ĭhief Judge Lavenski R.

The decision affirmed a lower judge’s decision to dismiss a case brought by the Arkansas State Conference NAACP and the Arkansas Public Policy Panel after giving U.S.

Stras was nominated by former President Donald Trump and Gruender by former President George W. Stras wrote for the majority in an opinion joined by Judge Raymond W. “When those details are missing, it is not our place to fill in the gaps, except when ‘text and structure’ require it,” U.S. Supreme Court tossed out heart of Voting Rights Act a decade ago, prompting wave of new voting rules

Deals to key west resorts